Statement:

- Anonymous
- I do not necessarily agree with everything that I post here. I post things here that I think are interesting, entertaining and/or thought provoking. Usually these things are controversial in nature. I promote peace and love and only wish to use this blog to educate myself and others.
Monday, April 19, 2010
9/11 Video Discusses Rudy Guiliani's involvement in 9/11
"Despite the protests of the victims' families as well as many scientists and engineers, Rudy Giuliani's administration worked hand in hand with the Bush Administration to immediately ship the 200 thousand tons of twisted, melted, demolished World Trade Center steel off to India and China to be recycled as scrap before anyone had a chance to do a forensic examination of it. This is not what normally happens to evidence in a crime scene, and is a clear indication of the Giuliani Administration and the Bush Administration's involvement in the crimes of 9/11" - Source : YouTube
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Not only that, but on 9/11 Guiliani was not in building 7 as he would normally be. He is reported to have been in a different location that day - further away from the World Trade Twin Towers and The Solomon Brother's Building 7. Convenient, yes, but incriminating? Hardly. But, there is more to that story.
Building 7 fell at free fall speed on 9/11 and there is plenty of evidence to show that Firefighters, BBC and the building owner Larry Silverstein knew the building would be coming down. Silverstein said in a PBS documentary that they decided to "pull it". To "pull it" is the terminology used by demolition experts to describe the controlled demolition of a building. Silverstein also made a substantial profit on the loss of those lives and buildings on 9/11. Only weeks before he took out a large insurance policy on the property and gained millions instead of losing millions that he would have lost in building repairs. Inspections showed that repairs were going to cost more than the property was worth at the time.
Where is the BBC getting its information? The BBC reported that building 7 had fallen 20 minutes before it actually did fall. An even more telling detail is that at the time this was reported, the Soloman Brothers Building 7 was still visible behind the reporter. Convenient? Certainly not. Incriminating? I think so.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Sheep Mutilation in the UK - Witnesses Saw Sheep Lasered By Unidentified Light from UFOs
Today, The Telegraph reported that "farmers near Shrewsbury (UK) claim to have witnessed sheep being “lasered” by unidentified light from UFOs".
This is very similar to the cattle mutilation phenomenon often investigated by Linda Moulton Howe, who is arguably the foremost expert on animal mutilations.
Here is the link to the documentary.
Many links and interviews with APFU members on the subject can be found here.
"They have linked the unexplained incidents, where sheep’s brains and eyes were removed, to the mysterious orange lights in the sky."
"They have found sheep with “neat holes” while their brains and other internal organs were removed. Other animals have lost eyes or had their flesh “carefully stripped away”, usually on the left side."
This is very similar to the cattle mutilation phenomenon often investigated by Linda Moulton Howe, who is arguably the foremost expert on animal mutilations.
"Phil Hoyle, 53, who has spent almost a decade investigating how the livestock have died, said the UFOs were found to have roamed a 50-mile "corridor" between Shrewsbury and Powys."
"Mr Hoyle and 15 members of the Animal Pathology Field Unit, claimed they witnessed UFOs at work last month while working during the night at a Welsh hill farm near Radnor Forest."In my search for more information about this, I came across a documentary called Silent Killers that documents the work of the Animal Pathology Field Unit mentioned in the Telegraph article above. In most cases, there is no blood left behind as you would expect from these types of mutilations. This is also the case with most cattle mutilations. One farmer claims this has been going on on his farm since 1954.
“The technology involved in these attacks is frightening,” he told The Sun.
“These lights and spheres are clearly not ours."
“They are built by technology and intelligence that's not from here.”
Here is the link to the documentary.
Many links and interviews with APFU members on the subject can be found here.
Whistleblower Report: Leaked Video Shows U.S. Cover Up - Follow Up Wikileaks video
Whistleblower Report: Leaked Video Shows U.S. ‘Coverup’
No one was firing at the soldiers. The shooter couldn't wait to shoot these people as if it was enjoyable. As a matter of fact, statements made like, "look at those dead bastards" complete with laughing and "it's their own fault for bring their children into a battle" show just how sick and lacking remorse these despicable men are. The so called "battle" was just US soldiers murdering people.
"WikiLeaks typically posts leaked documents, and lets reporters and readers reach their own conclusions. Now, the whistleblowing website has unveiled an in-depth report based on what it claims to be classified footage of a 2007 U.S. helicopter attack in Baghdad that claimed the lives of two Reuters employees, Saeed Chmagh and Namir Noor-Eldeen.In other words, it was a lie.
On July 12, 2007, Chmagh and Noor-Eldeen, members of the Reuters Baghdad bureau were killed on a reporting assignment in the neighborhood of New Baghdad. Witnesses said they were struck by gunfire from U.S. attack helicopters; at least nine other people were reportedly killed in the incident, and two children were wounded. Reuters had sought to obtain gunsight video shot by the Apache attack helicopters and other incident reports, but the U.S. military has not released the footage to the news organization.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said the organization was able to obtain a copy of the footage from an unnamed person (credited in the video as 'our courageous source'). 'The material was encrypted with a code, and we broke the code,' Assange said.
In addition, WikiLeaks sent two correspondents to Baghdad to verify the stories, fill in some blanks and conduct follow-on interviews with eyewitnesses and family members. Assange said WikiLeaks did not check the authenticity of the video with the Department of Defense, however.
Chmagh and Noor-Eldeen had gone to eastern Baghdad while a U.S. military operation was underway (click here to read a contemporary account by an embedded reporter from the Washington Post). It’s clear from some of the footage that there may have been a few — perhaps one or two — armed men in the square where the Apache’s burst of 30mm rounds hit. But the footage here does not seem to show anyone directing gunfire at U.S. troops, as was reported at the time."
"It was originally expected that WikiLeaks would release footage of a U.S. air strike last year in Afghanistan that reportedly claimed the lives of dozens of civilians (Assange said the group planned to release that footage, but were still 'working on it.')The audio and video above also shows that this statement is clearly a lie. They know damn well how the children were hurt. The soldiers eagerly fired their weapons at them. These lies told by the government are very disturbing.
WikiLeaks has also claimed this video furnishes evidence of a Pentagon 'coverup.' Whether that is the case is open to question: At the time, a military officer said: “No innocent civilians were killed on our part deliberately. We took great pains to prevent that. I know that two children were hurt, and we did everything we could to help them. I don’t know how the children were hurt.”
No one was firing at the soldiers. The shooter couldn't wait to shoot these people as if it was enjoyable. As a matter of fact, statements made like, "look at those dead bastards" complete with laughing and "it's their own fault for bring their children into a battle" show just how sick and lacking remorse these despicable men are. The so called "battle" was just US soldiers murdering people.
"This story, however, is significant in another respect: It shows how a website dedicated to anonymous leaks has become a venue for a more traditional model of investigative reporting. 'In terms of journalism efficiency, I think we discovered a lot with a small amount of resources,' Assange said. Combining leaked material and sending reporters into the field, he added, was a 'powerful combination'.”
Labels:
baghdad,
coverup,
US soldiers kill civilians,
whistleblower,
wikileaks
MIT Study Shows Magnetic Pulses Can Change Abilty to Tell Right From Wrong
March 30, 2010
(CBS) A device that emits an invisible beam affecting a person's ability to tell right from wrong might sound like the kind of weapon a comic book villain would use to wreak havoc around the world.
Study: Magnetic Waves Alter Moral Compass
MIT Researchers Find That Magnetic Pulses Directed at Brain Change People's Ability to Tell Right from Wrong
(CBS) A device that emits an invisible beam affecting a person's ability to tell right from wrong might sound like the kind of weapon a comic book villain would use to wreak havoc around the world.
Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say such a device allowed them to observe the effects magnetic rays have on a person's sense of morality.
In a new study, volunteers were subjected to magnetic pulses just above and behind of the right ear, focusing on the area of the brain believed to be the area controlling morality. The pulses were intended to block cell activity that contributed to the volunteers' sense of right and wrong.
MIT's researchers explain the study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Read More
Sunday, April 4, 2010
16 Year Old Girl Handcuffed To Pole For Hours, Arrested For Writing That She Loved Her Friends on a Desk With Erasable Marker
"(April 3) -- When 12-year-old Alexa Gonzalez was caught doodling on her desk at Junior High School 190 in Queens, New York, she expected detention and an afternoon on desk-cleaning duty. Instead, she was arrested, led out of her school in handcuffs and detained at a local police precinct for hours, she said.What did she write? It must have been something sinister right? Wrong.
Two months after the incident, Gonzalez and her mother, Maraima Comacho, are suing the New York City Education Department and the New York Police Department for $1 million in damages, claiming excessive use of force and violation of the girl's rights in the ordeal, which Comacho has called a "nightmare."
"We want to stop this from happening to other young children in the future," the family's lawyer, Joseph Rosenthal, told the New York Daily News.
Gonzalez describes the ordeal as traumatizing and excessive, saying that after her Spanish teacher caught her doodling on her desk with erasable green marker, she was "physically dragged by a teacher and an assistant principal" to the dean's office, where school safety officials searched her by placing "their hands inside the rear and front pockets of her jeans." Police were then summoned to arrest her.
Gonzalez told the Daily News she broke down as she was led out of her school in handcuffs.
"I started crying, like, a lot," said said. "I made two little doodles. ... It could be easily erased. To put handcuffs on me is unnecessary."
The legal papers filed by Rosenthal said Comacho was not permitted to accompany her daughter to the precinct and was instead told to go home and wait for a call. The documents also said that Gonzalez was detained in "an enclosed room" at the precinct and handcuffed to a pole for more than two hours."
"What were the doodled words that led to her arrest? 'I love my friends Abby and Faith,' Gonzalez said she wrote, adding 'Lex was here. 2/1/10' and a smiley face."
Read More
-----------------------------------------------
This is unacceptable on so many levels. I hope she wins her case.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)