9/11 Video Discusses Rudy Guiliani's involvement in 9/11

"Despite the protests of the victims' families as well as many scientists and engineers, Rudy Giuliani's administration worked hand in hand with the Bush Administration to immediately ship the 200 thousand tons of twisted, melted, demolished World Trade Center steel off to India and China to be recycled as scrap before anyone had a chance to do a forensic examination of it. This is not what normally happens to evidence in a crime scene, and is a clear indication of the Giuliani Administration and the Bush Administration's involvement in the crimes of 9/11" - Source : YouTube


```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Not only that, but on 9/11 Guiliani was not in building 7 as he would normally be. He is reported to have been in a different location that day - further away from the World Trade Twin Towers and The Solomon Brother's Building 7. Convenient, yes, but incriminating? Hardly. But, there is more to that story. 

Building 7 fell at free fall speed on 9/11 and there is plenty of evidence to show that Firefighters, BBC and the building owner Larry Silverstein knew the building would be coming down. Silverstein said in a PBS documentary that they decided to "pull it". To "pull it" is the terminology used by demolition experts to describe the controlled demolition of a building. Silverstein also made a substantial profit on the loss of those lives and buildings on 9/11. Only weeks before he took out a large insurance policy on the property and gained millions instead of losing millions that he would have lost in building repairs. Inspections showed that repairs were going to cost more than the property was worth at the time.

Where is the BBC getting its information? The BBC reported that building 7 had fallen 20 minutes before it actually did fall. An even more telling detail is that at the time this was reported, the Soloman Brothers Building 7 was still visible behind the reporter. Convenient? Certainly not. Incriminating? I think so.

Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth Speaks at Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth Conference

Erik Lawyer speaks at a conference held by Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth. He is the founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth.

"An Appeal to Firefighters, Present and Past from a retired FDNY Lieutenant
Fellow Firefighters, A great tragedy befell our community on September 11, 2001, an unprecedented 343 deaths in the line of duty. As horrible as that toll is, if there were a rational explanation for it, we could accept it and mourn. We all understood the risk we accepted when we took the oath of office, that chance might cut short our lives when we placed ourselves in harm’s way in the public’s service. This is what we are paid for and it is our honor. However, in short, the official explanation of the events of that day are not only insufficient, they are fantastic and cannot bear rational examination. We are asked to believe that on that day three structural steel buildings, which have never before in history collapsed because of fire, fell neatly into their basements at the speed of gravity, their concrete reduced to dust. We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel. We are asked to believe that the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, that responded to sixty-eight emergencies in the year prior to 9-11 in less than twenty minutes allowed aircraft to wander about for up to an hour and a half. We are asked to believe that the steel and titanium components of an aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon “evaporated”. There is much, much more if anyone cares to look into it. Trade Tower #7 by itself is the “smoking gun”. Not hit by an aircraft, with only a few relatively small fires, it came down in a classic crimp and implosion, going straight into its basement, something only very precise demolition can accomplish, which takes days if not weeks to prepare. The 9-11 Commission didn’t even mention it, and F.E.M.A. actually stated they DIDN’T KNOW WHY IT COLLAPSED AND LEFT IT AT THAT. Brothers, I know that the implications of the above are hard, almost unthinkable, but the official explanation is utter nonsense, and three hundred and forty three murdered brothers are crying out for justice. Demand a genuine investigation into the events of September 11!
-Anton Vodvarka, Lt. FDNY (ret)

Lt. Vodvarka served on FDNY Ladder Co 26, Rescue Co. 3, Rescue Co. 1, Engine Co. 92, Ladder 82 and Ladder 101. He was awarded the Merit Class 1 award, the Prentice Medal."

VISIT Firefighters For 911 Truth.Org

New 9/11 Ariel Photos - Russia Times Video

New pictures released thanks to a FOIA request show the Twin Tower collapse from a police helicopter on September 11, 2001. It's too bad the Russia Times didn't interview someone else in response to the release of these photographs. While I agree that it's good to point out when "we the people" have been lied to about the causes of climate change or the September 11 attacks, Badillo of WEARECHANGE was probably not the best choice for this news interview. I have nothing against him, I just don't think the interview helped the cause toward awakening people to the obvious points of evidence for a controlled demolition.

This subject is surrounded by multiple conspiracy theories and it is therefore best if people stick to the scientific evidence of thermate and the plausibility of 3 steel-framed skyscrapers collapsing for the first time in history, due to a fire that should not have been hot enough to melt steel. There isn't a lot of time to talk about this on TV so it's important that those that represent the call for an independent investigation always stick to the facts and get the important ones out there quickly and as thoroughly as possible. 

Perhaps Dr. Steven Jones or Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth would have been a more sound, qualified and credible choice. There was no mention of the evidence of explosives/ thermite/thermate found at the scene of ground zero.

I've read the comments at the Daily Mail and it still shocks me that the people can be so blindly convinced that this was not a controlled demolition and that for the first time ever not one, not two, but 3 steel framed skyscrapers "collapsed due to fire" all on the same day? Building 7 was not even hit by a plane and the owner said he made the decision to "pull it".(Which just happens to be controlled demolition lingo for bringing down a building with explosives). It too fell at nearly free-fall speed.

Not all "truthers" think it was an inside job. Some are only asking for a new independent investigation because there are many good reasons to doubt the official story.  Controlled demolition evidence is just a small part of it.  If there is nothing to hide, what is wrong with another independent investigation? Don't we owe the victims, first responders, American citizens, citizens of the world and especially the victims families at least that much? I don't think a new investigation is too much to ask for when one considers that the "official story" has been shown to be seriously flawed time and time again.




You can see Blueprint For Truth 2008 Edition (2 hour presentation) here. If you see this and still don't think controlled demolition was involved, I would be very surprised.


Web Resoucres Provided By ae911truth..org.
NYCCAN.org
The Journal of 9/11 Studies
9/11 Blogger
WTC7.net
0x1a.com
Patriots Question 9/11
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
C.S.I. 9/11
9/11 Facts and Questions - Akira Doujimaru
Kevin Ryan - U.L. Whistleblower
Visibility 9/11
9-11 Commission Report
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice