9/11 Video Discusses Rudy Guiliani's involvement in 9/11

"Despite the protests of the victims' families as well as many scientists and engineers, Rudy Giuliani's administration worked hand in hand with the Bush Administration to immediately ship the 200 thousand tons of twisted, melted, demolished World Trade Center steel off to India and China to be recycled as scrap before anyone had a chance to do a forensic examination of it. This is not what normally happens to evidence in a crime scene, and is a clear indication of the Giuliani Administration and the Bush Administration's involvement in the crimes of 9/11" - Source : YouTube


```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Not only that, but on 9/11 Guiliani was not in building 7 as he would normally be. He is reported to have been in a different location that day - further away from the World Trade Twin Towers and The Solomon Brother's Building 7. Convenient, yes, but incriminating? Hardly. But, there is more to that story. 

Building 7 fell at free fall speed on 9/11 and there is plenty of evidence to show that Firefighters, BBC and the building owner Larry Silverstein knew the building would be coming down. Silverstein said in a PBS documentary that they decided to "pull it". To "pull it" is the terminology used by demolition experts to describe the controlled demolition of a building. Silverstein also made a substantial profit on the loss of those lives and buildings on 9/11. Only weeks before he took out a large insurance policy on the property and gained millions instead of losing millions that he would have lost in building repairs. Inspections showed that repairs were going to cost more than the property was worth at the time.

Where is the BBC getting its information? The BBC reported that building 7 had fallen 20 minutes before it actually did fall. An even more telling detail is that at the time this was reported, the Soloman Brothers Building 7 was still visible behind the reporter. Convenient? Certainly not. Incriminating? I think so.

With Glenn Beck leading the charge, mainstream media swarms on TX Gov. candidate Medina for not disavowing 9/11 Truthers

With Glenn Beck leading the charge, mainstream media swarms on TX Gov. candidate Medina for not disavowing 9/11 Truthers

"Today, in a move that illustrates exactly why Glenn Beck has painstakingly tried to portray himself over the past year as some kind of man of the people while hosting a show on the infamous Fox News Channel that cheered the War in Iraq, he turned an interview with Debra Medina, a candidate for the TX Governer seat, into a PR ambush on her and the 9/11 Truth movement."

As usual, FOX News and Glenn Beck continue to try and discredit anyone who questions the official 9/11 story.

She has posted a followup on her website:

Medina Campaign Responds to Glenn Beck Interview
by Debra Medina on Feb 11, 2010

I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones.

The question surprised me because it's not relevant to this race or the issues facing Texans. This campaign has always been about private property rights and state sovereignty. It is focused on the issues facing Texans. It is not a vehicle for the 9-11 truth movement or any other group.

The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered by so clearly taking their direction from special interests instead of the people, whether it's Rick Perry and his HPV mandate or Kay Hutchison and voting for the bank bailout. It is absolutely the right and duty of a free people to question their government. Texas does not need another politician who tells you what you want to hear, then violates your liberties and steals your property anyway. I fully expect to be questioned and to be held accountable as Governor, and that's the underlying issue here: should people be questioning their government. And the answer is yes, they should be."

New 9/11 Ariel Photos - Russia Times Video

New pictures released thanks to a FOIA request show the Twin Tower collapse from a police helicopter on September 11, 2001. It's too bad the Russia Times didn't interview someone else in response to the release of these photographs. While I agree that it's good to point out when "we the people" have been lied to about the causes of climate change or the September 11 attacks, Badillo of WEARECHANGE was probably not the best choice for this news interview. I have nothing against him, I just don't think the interview helped the cause toward awakening people to the obvious points of evidence for a controlled demolition.

This subject is surrounded by multiple conspiracy theories and it is therefore best if people stick to the scientific evidence of thermate and the plausibility of 3 steel-framed skyscrapers collapsing for the first time in history, due to a fire that should not have been hot enough to melt steel. There isn't a lot of time to talk about this on TV so it's important that those that represent the call for an independent investigation always stick to the facts and get the important ones out there quickly and as thoroughly as possible. 

Perhaps Dr. Steven Jones or Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth would have been a more sound, qualified and credible choice. There was no mention of the evidence of explosives/ thermite/thermate found at the scene of ground zero.

I've read the comments at the Daily Mail and it still shocks me that the people can be so blindly convinced that this was not a controlled demolition and that for the first time ever not one, not two, but 3 steel framed skyscrapers "collapsed due to fire" all on the same day? Building 7 was not even hit by a plane and the owner said he made the decision to "pull it".(Which just happens to be controlled demolition lingo for bringing down a building with explosives). It too fell at nearly free-fall speed.

Not all "truthers" think it was an inside job. Some are only asking for a new independent investigation because there are many good reasons to doubt the official story.  Controlled demolition evidence is just a small part of it.  If there is nothing to hide, what is wrong with another independent investigation? Don't we owe the victims, first responders, American citizens, citizens of the world and especially the victims families at least that much? I don't think a new investigation is too much to ask for when one considers that the "official story" has been shown to be seriously flawed time and time again.




You can see Blueprint For Truth 2008 Edition (2 hour presentation) here. If you see this and still don't think controlled demolition was involved, I would be very surprised.


Web Resoucres Provided By ae911truth..org.
NYCCAN.org
The Journal of 9/11 Studies
9/11 Blogger
WTC7.net
0x1a.com
Patriots Question 9/11
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
C.S.I. 9/11
9/11 Facts and Questions - Akira Doujimaru
Kevin Ryan - U.L. Whistleblower
Visibility 9/11
9-11 Commission Report
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice