9/11 Documentaries + New Press Conference by Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth

I haven't posted as often or as much as I normally do. I have been busy watching documentaries, reading, and living life offline. I have seen some interesting things and will post links to all of them at the end of this post. First off, I have watched a few more 9/11 documentaries because I like to know what is being presented to the public and even if I don't agree with what I see, I don't want to ignore it. I will go into more detail later about what I believe, what I don't believe, and what I am unsure of. I absolutely think that the 9/11 "official story" is severely inadequate, as several recent posts should have made clear.

I tend to be passionate about this because the media and people who seem to have done little to no research are so quick to assume that anyone who doubts the official story is a kook, crazy, dangerous, nasty, terrorists, conspiracy theorists and those are just some of the polite words that have been used by mainstream media to describe - not only the 9/11 Truth Movement - but anyone who admits that they doubt the official story. Survivors and families of victims are not immune to this cruel and ignorant personal attacks. They have been invited to come tell their sad but loving stories about their lost loved ones and have been turned on once they are filming and called conspiracy theorists. Despicable. If the media says it is so - it must be true, right? Very wrong. That is an ignorant way of thinking, but chances are that if you are reading this you already know that.

Let's not forget the credentials of those who've made themselves known for doubting this "official story": Families of victims, survivors, veterans, architects and engineers, pilots, scholars, congressmen, teachers, religious leaders, police and firemen, and thousands of others who feel they have good reasons to question the events of that day. As I have said before, there are at least 40 valid questions that the official story fails to properly address or explain and that is a very polite way of putting it.

The is so much evidence of a controlled demolition with the evidence of nano-thermite at ground zero, I don't understand how it can be denied that explosives were used. It is not a commercial grade explosive. It is manufactured and used by the military. Yet, some people still have the nerve to ignore this important issue. People are either not being honest with themselves, are unknowingly brainwashed, uninformed, and/or remain willfully ignorant. It's the only logical conclusion I can come to for considering that important group of people crazy for such an innocent reason.

Most of these truth-seeking individuals just want an independent investigation with hopes that those whom are responsible will be held accountable. That should not be considered crazy or unpatriotic. If you think it is, then in my opinion, you may consider turning off your television and actually try to investigate the other side a little more.

Documentaries? Here is a link to at least 28 Documentaries about 9/11. Yes, 28. I have not seen them all yet but I plan to give them all a look. The worst one I have seen yet was a ridiculous, disappointing, insulting smear campaign brought to you by The History Channel. 9/11 Conspiracy: Fact/Fiction was by far the worst and most disrespectful documentary I have seen on the subject thus far.

These are the documentaries that I have watched most recently and recommend:
9/11 Mysteries - Excellent Important Documentary


Blueprint for Truth: Architecture of Destruction (Excellent Evidence From Architects&Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Core of Corruption: In The Shadows - More About Terrorist Evidence and Odd Intelligence Failures

9/11 Press For Truth - (Families Are Still Searching For Answers)

Most Recent:
Press Conference: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in San Francisco, CA on Feb 19, 2010.
As of today when I counted 8,400 people have signed their petition for a new independent investigation. This is progress. 

New 9/11 Ariel Photos - Russia Times Video

New pictures released thanks to a FOIA request show the Twin Tower collapse from a police helicopter on September 11, 2001. It's too bad the Russia Times didn't interview someone else in response to the release of these photographs. While I agree that it's good to point out when "we the people" have been lied to about the causes of climate change or the September 11 attacks, Badillo of WEARECHANGE was probably not the best choice for this news interview. I have nothing against him, I just don't think the interview helped the cause toward awakening people to the obvious points of evidence for a controlled demolition.

This subject is surrounded by multiple conspiracy theories and it is therefore best if people stick to the scientific evidence of thermate and the plausibility of 3 steel-framed skyscrapers collapsing for the first time in history, due to a fire that should not have been hot enough to melt steel. There isn't a lot of time to talk about this on TV so it's important that those that represent the call for an independent investigation always stick to the facts and get the important ones out there quickly and as thoroughly as possible. 

Perhaps Dr. Steven Jones or Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth would have been a more sound, qualified and credible choice. There was no mention of the evidence of explosives/ thermite/thermate found at the scene of ground zero.

I've read the comments at the Daily Mail and it still shocks me that the people can be so blindly convinced that this was not a controlled demolition and that for the first time ever not one, not two, but 3 steel framed skyscrapers "collapsed due to fire" all on the same day? Building 7 was not even hit by a plane and the owner said he made the decision to "pull it".(Which just happens to be controlled demolition lingo for bringing down a building with explosives). It too fell at nearly free-fall speed.

Not all "truthers" think it was an inside job. Some are only asking for a new independent investigation because there are many good reasons to doubt the official story.  Controlled demolition evidence is just a small part of it.  If there is nothing to hide, what is wrong with another independent investigation? Don't we owe the victims, first responders, American citizens, citizens of the world and especially the victims families at least that much? I don't think a new investigation is too much to ask for when one considers that the "official story" has been shown to be seriously flawed time and time again.




You can see Blueprint For Truth 2008 Edition (2 hour presentation) here. If you see this and still don't think controlled demolition was involved, I would be very surprised.


Web Resoucres Provided By ae911truth..org.
NYCCAN.org
The Journal of 9/11 Studies
9/11 Blogger
WTC7.net
0x1a.com
Patriots Question 9/11
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
C.S.I. 9/11
9/11 Facts and Questions - Akira Doujimaru
Kevin Ryan - U.L. Whistleblower
Visibility 9/11
9-11 Commission Report
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice