9/11 Video Discusses Rudy Guiliani's involvement in 9/11

"Despite the protests of the victims' families as well as many scientists and engineers, Rudy Giuliani's administration worked hand in hand with the Bush Administration to immediately ship the 200 thousand tons of twisted, melted, demolished World Trade Center steel off to India and China to be recycled as scrap before anyone had a chance to do a forensic examination of it. This is not what normally happens to evidence in a crime scene, and is a clear indication of the Giuliani Administration and the Bush Administration's involvement in the crimes of 9/11" - Source : YouTube


```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Not only that, but on 9/11 Guiliani was not in building 7 as he would normally be. He is reported to have been in a different location that day - further away from the World Trade Twin Towers and The Solomon Brother's Building 7. Convenient, yes, but incriminating? Hardly. But, there is more to that story. 

Building 7 fell at free fall speed on 9/11 and there is plenty of evidence to show that Firefighters, BBC and the building owner Larry Silverstein knew the building would be coming down. Silverstein said in a PBS documentary that they decided to "pull it". To "pull it" is the terminology used by demolition experts to describe the controlled demolition of a building. Silverstein also made a substantial profit on the loss of those lives and buildings on 9/11. Only weeks before he took out a large insurance policy on the property and gained millions instead of losing millions that he would have lost in building repairs. Inspections showed that repairs were going to cost more than the property was worth at the time.

Where is the BBC getting its information? The BBC reported that building 7 had fallen 20 minutes before it actually did fall. An even more telling detail is that at the time this was reported, the Soloman Brothers Building 7 was still visible behind the reporter. Convenient? Certainly not. Incriminating? I think so.

9/11 Documentaries + New Press Conference by Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth

I haven't posted as often or as much as I normally do. I have been busy watching documentaries, reading, and living life offline. I have seen some interesting things and will post links to all of them at the end of this post. First off, I have watched a few more 9/11 documentaries because I like to know what is being presented to the public and even if I don't agree with what I see, I don't want to ignore it. I will go into more detail later about what I believe, what I don't believe, and what I am unsure of. I absolutely think that the 9/11 "official story" is severely inadequate, as several recent posts should have made clear.

I tend to be passionate about this because the media and people who seem to have done little to no research are so quick to assume that anyone who doubts the official story is a kook, crazy, dangerous, nasty, terrorists, conspiracy theorists and those are just some of the polite words that have been used by mainstream media to describe - not only the 9/11 Truth Movement - but anyone who admits that they doubt the official story. Survivors and families of victims are not immune to this cruel and ignorant personal attacks. They have been invited to come tell their sad but loving stories about their lost loved ones and have been turned on once they are filming and called conspiracy theorists. Despicable. If the media says it is so - it must be true, right? Very wrong. That is an ignorant way of thinking, but chances are that if you are reading this you already know that.

Let's not forget the credentials of those who've made themselves known for doubting this "official story": Families of victims, survivors, veterans, architects and engineers, pilots, scholars, congressmen, teachers, religious leaders, police and firemen, and thousands of others who feel they have good reasons to question the events of that day. As I have said before, there are at least 40 valid questions that the official story fails to properly address or explain and that is a very polite way of putting it.

The is so much evidence of a controlled demolition with the evidence of nano-thermite at ground zero, I don't understand how it can be denied that explosives were used. It is not a commercial grade explosive. It is manufactured and used by the military. Yet, some people still have the nerve to ignore this important issue. People are either not being honest with themselves, are unknowingly brainwashed, uninformed, and/or remain willfully ignorant. It's the only logical conclusion I can come to for considering that important group of people crazy for such an innocent reason.

Most of these truth-seeking individuals just want an independent investigation with hopes that those whom are responsible will be held accountable. That should not be considered crazy or unpatriotic. If you think it is, then in my opinion, you may consider turning off your television and actually try to investigate the other side a little more.

Documentaries? Here is a link to at least 28 Documentaries about 9/11. Yes, 28. I have not seen them all yet but I plan to give them all a look. The worst one I have seen yet was a ridiculous, disappointing, insulting smear campaign brought to you by The History Channel. 9/11 Conspiracy: Fact/Fiction was by far the worst and most disrespectful documentary I have seen on the subject thus far.

These are the documentaries that I have watched most recently and recommend:
9/11 Mysteries - Excellent Important Documentary


Blueprint for Truth: Architecture of Destruction (Excellent Evidence From Architects&Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Core of Corruption: In The Shadows - More About Terrorist Evidence and Odd Intelligence Failures

9/11 Press For Truth - (Families Are Still Searching For Answers)

Most Recent:
Press Conference: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in San Francisco, CA on Feb 19, 2010.
As of today when I counted 8,400 people have signed their petition for a new independent investigation. This is progress.