9/11 Eyewitness - Top Documentary

Thanks to Top Documentary Films, I came across this: "Best Historical Documentary 2007 - New York International Independent Film Festival" winner that I had not seen about 9/11. This is another excellent and rare set of footage due to the quality, angle, transcript and calls of the news report. This video is another very tastefully presented addition to the pieces of evidence we have available to us of the WTC tragedies. Like the last few of these posted, I highly recommend that everyone see this.

"And there was just a hole and black smoke. It just looked like a cigar standing up on end with burning tip and black smoke. Which again, why black smoke? It’s ready to go out. And then it went on and the building was just burning away and it wasn’t too exciting until all of the sudden it’s disappearing and there was no real sign, there was no sign that this was going to go down because of all the black smoke. And the black smoke is really indicative that the fire is out.

Local news radio coverage was recorded by the on-camera microphone while Rick Siegel videotaped the events of 9/11 from the Hoboken pier. Scientific analysis is presented in an easy to understand manner. The pictures tell the story and this is one story that all New Yorkers, and anyone who was traumatized by the shocking attack on the WTC, must see. In memory of all those who perished, 911 Eyewitness is a voice of the victims that must never be forgotten.

This powerful documentary features eyewitness testimony and scientific analysis of the collapse of the Twin Towers and Seven World Trade. The American Public and American Republic have been betrayed and now it’s time to learn the truth and share it with your skeptical friends. (Excerpt from 911eyewitness.com)"

Click here to see this documentary now. You can download it at the link above. Part 1 appears to be a combination of part 2 and 3. Not sure what is going on there because when I checked on 2 and 3 they appeared to be shorter versions of what was in Part One. If anyone else notices differently, please post a comment and let me know. Thanks.

National Security Alert - 9/11 Documentary. MUST SEE

"In 2006 Citizen Investigation Team launched an independent investigation into the act of terrorism which took place at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

This exhaustive three-year inquest involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day.

Be forewarned: Our findings are extraordinarily shocking and frightening. They are also deadly serious, and deserving of your immediate attention. This is not about a conspiracy theory or any theory at all.

This is about independent, verifiable evidence which unfortunately happens to conclusively establish as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a false flag “black operation” involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception." (Excerpt from citizeninvestigationteam.com)

 This is another MUST SEE documentary that shows that there are some serious discrepancies between the "official reports" and what credible eyewitnesses claim took place on September 11, 2001. The flight path described by these witnesses of the plane said to have hit The Pentagon do not match the south flight path described in the official story. In fact, several police officers and at least 12 other witnesses independently point out that they saw the plane coming from the north, not the south and in great detail. They stand by their statements but are forbidden by superiors to discuss 9/11 anymore. These witnesses saw the plane at a close distance.  This was not a matter of a change of path causing confusion. There was not time for that in the flight paths described and drawn by the witnesses at that point in the flight. The south path is where there was evidence of damage to the light posts and a taxi cab, so it is even more odd that this path is not corroborated by these witnesses.

What caused that damage to those light posts if these witnesses claim to have seen the plane coming from a different direction? Did all 13 of these people who work in this area every day get it wrong, but all report almost exactly the same path? If a person saw something like this, I would assume it would be unlikely they would not remember where they saw a plane traveling that low. The statements made by "Lloyd - The cab driver" are very revealing and suggest that he is either unsure of what happened or he is being dishonest. The latter seems more likely considering what he was willing to say when he wasn't aware that he was being recorded. You should see it for yourself. This was a fair and tastefully produced documentary. I highly recommend that everyone watch this and will continue to examine the events surrounding the Pentagon and all events that took place on 9/11/01.

$7 Gas Prices to Meet Obama's CO2 Emissions Cut - That Should Do It...

Again, no surprises here. I am hoping this is a generous estimate.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
March 2, 2010, 6:35 pm

Fuel Taxes Must Rise, Harvard Researchers Say

By SINDYA N. BHANOO

"To meet the Obama administration’s targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, some researchers say, Americans may have to experience a sobering reality: gas at $7 a gallon.
To reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector 14 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, the cost of driving must simply increase, according to a forthcoming report by researchers at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
The 14 percent target was set in the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget for fiscal 2010.
In their study, the researchers devised several combinations of steps that United States policymakers might take in trying to address the heat-trapping emissions by the nation’s transportation sector, which consume 70 percent of the oil used in the United States.
Most of their models assumed an economy-wide carbon dioxide tax starting at $30 a ton in 2010 and escalating to $60 a ton in 2030. In some cases researchers also factored in tax credits for electric and hybrid vehicles, taxes on fuel or both.
In the modeling, it turned out that issuing tax credits could backfire, while taxes on fuel proved beneficial.
“Tax credits don’t address how much people use their cars,” said Ross Morrow, one of the report’s authors. “In reverse, they can make people drive more.”
Dr. Morrow, formerly a fellow at the Belfer Center, is a professor of mechanical engineering and economics at Iowa State University
Researchers said that vehicle miles traveled will increase by more than 30 percent between 2010 and 2030 unless policymakers increase fuel taxes."

SOURCE: NY TIMES/ DOT EARTH

9/11 Documentaries + New Press Conference by Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth

I haven't posted as often or as much as I normally do. I have been busy watching documentaries, reading, and living life offline. I have seen some interesting things and will post links to all of them at the end of this post. First off, I have watched a few more 9/11 documentaries because I like to know what is being presented to the public and even if I don't agree with what I see, I don't want to ignore it. I will go into more detail later about what I believe, what I don't believe, and what I am unsure of. I absolutely think that the 9/11 "official story" is severely inadequate, as several recent posts should have made clear.

I tend to be passionate about this because the media and people who seem to have done little to no research are so quick to assume that anyone who doubts the official story is a kook, crazy, dangerous, nasty, terrorists, conspiracy theorists and those are just some of the polite words that have been used by mainstream media to describe - not only the 9/11 Truth Movement - but anyone who admits that they doubt the official story. Survivors and families of victims are not immune to this cruel and ignorant personal attacks. They have been invited to come tell their sad but loving stories about their lost loved ones and have been turned on once they are filming and called conspiracy theorists. Despicable. If the media says it is so - it must be true, right? Very wrong. That is an ignorant way of thinking, but chances are that if you are reading this you already know that.

Let's not forget the credentials of those who've made themselves known for doubting this "official story": Families of victims, survivors, veterans, architects and engineers, pilots, scholars, congressmen, teachers, religious leaders, police and firemen, and thousands of others who feel they have good reasons to question the events of that day. As I have said before, there are at least 40 valid questions that the official story fails to properly address or explain and that is a very polite way of putting it.

The is so much evidence of a controlled demolition with the evidence of nano-thermite at ground zero, I don't understand how it can be denied that explosives were used. It is not a commercial grade explosive. It is manufactured and used by the military. Yet, some people still have the nerve to ignore this important issue. People are either not being honest with themselves, are unknowingly brainwashed, uninformed, and/or remain willfully ignorant. It's the only logical conclusion I can come to for considering that important group of people crazy for such an innocent reason.

Most of these truth-seeking individuals just want an independent investigation with hopes that those whom are responsible will be held accountable. That should not be considered crazy or unpatriotic. If you think it is, then in my opinion, you may consider turning off your television and actually try to investigate the other side a little more.

Documentaries? Here is a link to at least 28 Documentaries about 9/11. Yes, 28. I have not seen them all yet but I plan to give them all a look. The worst one I have seen yet was a ridiculous, disappointing, insulting smear campaign brought to you by The History Channel. 9/11 Conspiracy: Fact/Fiction was by far the worst and most disrespectful documentary I have seen on the subject thus far.

These are the documentaries that I have watched most recently and recommend:
9/11 Mysteries - Excellent Important Documentary


Blueprint for Truth: Architecture of Destruction (Excellent Evidence From Architects&Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Core of Corruption: In The Shadows - More About Terrorist Evidence and Odd Intelligence Failures

9/11 Press For Truth - (Families Are Still Searching For Answers)

Most Recent:
Press Conference: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in San Francisco, CA on Feb 19, 2010.
As of today when I counted 8,400 people have signed their petition for a new independent investigation. This is progress. 

Big Pharma researcher admits to faking dozens of research studies for Pfizer, Merck (opinion)

Big Pharma researcher admits to faking dozens of research studies for Pfizer, Merck

"(NaturalNews) It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.

Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study!

Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway.

It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.

As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted.

After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.

He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100...)"


Read More

9/11 Conspiracy FACT Video

9/11 Conspiracy FACT Video


Disclose.tv 9/11 Conspiracy FACT Video

Missing pieces of the story:

In the first ‘Loose Change’ they mention that Flight 93’s tail number matched a plane that landed at Hopkins International Airport in Cleveland...

According to these reports, people were evacuated off 2 commercial planes and the people on the mystery plane, which we have identified as Flight 93, moved into the NASA Hanger at Hopkins...

Both AA11 and UA Flight 175 out of Boston appear to have been swapped for military AWACS drones at Stewart AB in Newburgh, NY where they both crossed over the airport at the exact same time. So if the original flights landed at Stewart AFB, what happened to those passengers?

Finally, It was obviously a missile and not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon, so what happened to the original Flight 77 and all the people with Top Secret clearances who were aboard? Were they assassinated or did they have their death’s faked so they could go work on an even more top secret mission? We can find a TriState Airport extremely close to the point where Flight 77 was "hijacked"...Could Flight 77 have landed there?

The same Coroner signed off on all the bodies from all 4 Flights... Furthermore, he claimed to have identified the terrorists using DNA evidence which would require them to have samples of the Terrorist’s DNA prior to 9/11…

I believe an Air Force AWACS Fighter Jet shot the missile at the Pentagon, because the Pentagon is surrounded on all sides by SAM (Surface to Air Missiles) sites which automatically shoot down anything approaching that doesn't display a "friendly" signal. Only "Friendlies" would have that signal, and only our own Military Air Craft can fly over the Pentagon without being shot out of the sky. Never mind do an impossible 220 degree dive maneuver in plain view and clear range of these SAM sites...
Besides if terrorists were really flying this plane they would have dove straight into the North Wing where all the main offices were, not the West Wing...

Bush-Bin Laden meeting:
http://www.wanttoknow.info/030316post

Mahmoud Ahmed 9/11 meeting:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/041203metwithbinladen.html

Porter Goss:
http://www.counterpunch.org/mcgovern07062004.html

http://the911forum.freeforums.org/nist-s-ua175-impact-simulation-wrong-t181.html

The end result...

http://femr2.ucoz.com/draft175.htm
http://femr2.ucoz.com/draft175-part2.htm

Source: 9_11_Conspiracy Fact

Hilarious Satire - How To Destroy A 9/11 Truther